The End of the US–Iran War and Global Disruption?Or Just the Beginning?
Why Markets Are Mispricing the Next Wave of Global Disruption
With the US–Iran two-week ceasefire now in effect (April 7–8), markets have responded predictably—pricing in immediate relief through lower crude benchmarks and the conditional reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. However, this reaction reflects a first-order view of the conflict.
A deeper analysis reveals that the true economic impact is only beginning to unfold, with second- and third-order effects likely to drive sustained global disruption across energy, agriculture, industrial supply chains, and advanced technology.
- Oil & Refined Fuels – The First Dominos
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), approximately 20.9 million barrels per day (~20% of global petroleum liquids consumption) flowed through the Strait of Hormuz in the first half of 2025. The conflict has triggered the largest energy supply shock in history, with 9–12+ million b/d of regional shut-ins at peak. Even with the ceasefire, full restoration will take weeks, months and possibly years, depending on final damage assessments and insurance repricing.
Deeper Analysis: Refined products are the real near-term pain point. Diesel and jet fuel inventories were already tight; the loss of Gulf exports has created bottlenecks at Asian and European refineries that cannot easily switch crude slates. Historical analogues show price spikes of 30–100% are probable. This embedded energy cost will ripple into trucking, aviation, and manufacturing margins faster than headline prices suggest.
- Natural Gas (LNG) & Fertiliser – The Silent Amplifier to Food Systems
According to data from the Energy Institute, Qatar supplies ~20% of global LNG exports. Iranian strikes on Ras Laffan facilities forced a full production halt, removing up to 20% of global LNG trade flows almost overnight (with ~17% of Qatar’s LNG capacity sidelined for 3–5 years). LNG is not easily substitutable due to long-term contracts and heavy reliance in Europe and Asia.
Deeper Analysis: The true under-appreciated link is fertiliser. Ammonia and urea production is ~70–80% dependent on natural gas; the outage is feeding directly into 2026–2027 planting seasons. India and China (which import ~40% of global urea) face yield reductions of 5–15% in key staple crops. Past shocks saw fertiliser prices rise 2–5× and food prices follow with a 6–12 month lag. This is where energy pain becomes social instability, yet mainstream coverage focuses mainly on European
- Helium – The Tiny Atom That Can Halt Semiconductors, Processors & AI
According to the USGS, Qatar produced ~63 million cubic metres of helium in 2025 — roughly one-third of global supply. The Ras Laffan airstrikes took out one of the world’s two plants capable of producing semiconductor-grade helium. With helium output projected to be
Deeper Analysis: Helium has no viable substitutes for MRI machines (~30% of demand), fibre-optics, and ultra-pure atmospheres in chip fabrication. Recycling rates are only ~50–60%, and new plants take 2–3 years to build. A ~30% supply hit could stretch semiconductor lead times by months, delaying AI data-centres, EVs, and consumer electronics. Almost no one is modelling this drag on the technology stack.
- Sulphur & Petrochemicals – The Cross-Sector Amplifiers
Qatar’s sulphur output represents ~8% of global seaborne trade, according to Argus estimates (with a ~6% drop from the attacks). QatarEnergy has halted all sulphur production, LNG, and all associated products. Sulphur is essential for phosphate fertilisers and metal processing, while petrochemical feedstocks underpin plastics, paints, tyres, and consumer goods.
Deeper Analysis: These are classic “quiet multipliers.” Sulphur shortages add 5–10% cost pressure to crops, while petrochemical disruptions embed inflation across everyday items with 3–9-month lags. This creates a broad-based but invisible cost-push that we believe markets are currently under-pricing.
Venezuela – The Strategic Hedge – That Isn’t a Quick Fix
The Trump administration’s early-2026 removal of Nicolás Maduro was viewed as a pre-emptive move to secure alternative heavy crude supplies. Venezuelan production (1 million b/d) has seen modest gains, with a 30–40% increase (300–400 kb/d) projected for 2026.
Deeper Analysis: Venezuela’s extra-heavy sour oil (8–18° API) is far more difficult and costly to process into gasoline than lighter Gulf crudes. It requires specialised refining, scarce diluents, and years of infrastructure upgrades. Refining costs can reach $65–80 per barrel, and full ramp-up will take years — not months. This limits its ability to offset the Hormuz-style light-crude shock.
Is This Worse Than the 1970s Oil Crises?
Yes – in several critical dimensions. The 1970s shocks were narrower and slower-moving. According to the IEA, today’s effective Hormuz disruption removed 9–12+ mbpd initially (10–20% of global liquids), described by IEA chief Fatih Birol as “more serious than the ones in 1973, 1979 and 2022 together.”
The 1970s were almost entirely focused on crude oil. Today’s shock simultaneously hits ~20% of global LNG (fertiliser/power), ~30% of helium (semiconductors/AI), and sulphur/petrochemicals — multipliers absent fifty years ago. Globalisation and just-in-time chains amplify transmission, while the food-energy-tech nexus creates asymmetric risks. Venezuela’s heavy crude hedge helps only marginally.
Portal Bottom Line: The 1970s saw linear oil price shocks. This is a systemic supply-shock cascade — larger, faster, and hitting modern vulnerabilities that did not exist previously. Sources: IEA statements (March–April 2026); Reuters, The Guardian, CNBC.
Financial Markets: Relief Rally or Complacency?
Markets have staged a short-term relief rally, but is optimism premature?
Too optimistic? Yes. Pricing assumes swift normalisation, yet infrastructure repairs will take months, and second-order lags will hit earnings and CPI from Q3 onward.
Assets most at risk: Technology/semiconductors (helium delays to AI); consumer cyclicals and industrials (inflation in plastics, tyres, food); emerging-market equities/currencies (food-energy shocks); and bonds (higher inflation expectations).
Risk-off behaviour? Absolutely — equities lower, USD stronger, gold as a partial haven, rotation into defensives.
Volatility? Yes, and it has already surged. Oil volatility hit extremes in March; VIX remains elevated. Truce fragility will sustain high implied volatility into H2 2026.
Bitcoin’s position: Bitcoin has acted as a high-beta risk asset with conditional safe-haven traits. It sold off sharply initially but outperformed equities and gold during the acute phase, then surged 4–5% on the ceasefire. In a prolonged shock, it could benefit from inflation-hedge narratives (fixed supply amid CPI pressure) and capital flight into decentralised assets. However, its correlation with Nasdaq tech makes it vulnerable to risk-off deleveraging if semiconductor delays hit AI stocks or inflation delays rate cuts. Overall, BTC is not a reliable short-term safe haven like gold but has shown resilience and even outperformance in this specific 2026 regime — acting more as “digital gold with beta” once initial panic subsides. Expect elevated volatility: risk-on relief on de-escalation, but sharp drawdowns if hidden lags materialise.
The ceasefire buys time, but the damage to infrastructure, confidence, and forward-looking supply chains is already done. Physical repairs at Ras Laffan will take months to years, while confidence in contracts and logistics has eroded. We believe the true economic cost will reveal itself in Q3–Q4 2026 and extend into 2027 through slower global growth, higher persistent food prices (fertiliser lag into next seasons), technology friction (semiconductor delays), and stubborn core CPI pressure — exactly the areas markets are ignoring in their relief rally.
Volatility: The New Normal?
Developing nations face the greatest risk of inflation, famine, and social strain. Even if the truce holds, the interconnected energy-food-tech systems mean the full cascade will unfold with lags, testing policymakers in ways the 1970s never did — while markets grapple with current volatility and risk-off dynamics, one economic factor looks assured: volatility is likely a constant for months and possibly years to come.
Disclaimer:
This document does not constitute an offer of Participating Shares in the Fund. The offer of Participating Shares is made solely pursuant to the Offering Memorandum for the Funds (the “Offering Memorandum”). An application for subscription for Participating Shares may only be made by completing and returning the subscription agreement issued by the Fund (the “Subscription Agreement”). Copies of the Offering Memorandum and the Subscription Agreement for the Portal Digital Fund may be obtained from First Degree Global Asset Management Pte. Ltd., the Investment Manager of the Fund or the Portal Radiance MutliStrategy Fund may be obtained from Lima Capital LLC.
This email is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment or financial advice nor an offer to acquire a financial product. Before acting on any information contained in this email, each person should obtain independent taxation, financial and legal advice relating to this information and consider it carefully before making any decision or recommendation. To the extent this email does contain advice, in preparing any such advice in this email, we have not taken into account any particular person’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Furthermore, you may not rely on this message as advice unless subsequently confirmed by a letter signed by an authorised representative of Portal Asset Management Pte Ltd (Portal). You should, before acting on this information, consider the appropriateness of this information having regard to your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. We recommend that you obtain financial advice tailored to your situation before making any investment or insurance decision.
This email is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorised use of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please contact us and delete all copies of the email. Before opening or using attachments, please check the attachments for viruses and defects. Portal does not accept liability for any loss or damage, however caused, which may result from this communication or any files attached. Portal collects personal information to provide and market our services. For more details about how your information is used, disclosed, or accessed, you may obtain a copy of our privacy policy upon request